Sorption vs. Separation – Prototype Comparison of Two Approaches to Façade-Integrated Dehumidification

Publication information:

Lazovskis P, Alvarenga J, Teitelbaum E, Merchant C, Rucewicz S, Cabrera P, Rebbagondla JM, Norford L, Aizenberg J, Grinham J, et al. Sorption vs. Separation – Prototype Comparison of Two Approaches to Façade-Integrated Dehumidification. Multiphysics and Multiscale Building Physics. 2025:130–139,.

Abstract

We present an alternative concept to vapor-compression air conditioning, by using sorption-based and separation-based methods to manipulate air humidity and velocity, in order to achieve higher efficiency comfort conditions and healthier air for hot and humid climates. Dry air moving over skin in such climates has been shown to increase the number of thermal comfort hours that do not require cooling, reducing building energy consumption. We have constructed prototypes for each method and have designed them for attachment to the exteriors of buildings that will, in the future, likely have to consider retrofit due to rising heat levels. Our lab and field tests yielded promising results, and our theoretical models show dehumidification coefficients of performance higher than equivalently sized vapor compression systems. The sorption-based system dehumidified better at fan driven air speed, while the separation-based system performed better at lower air speed. Both prototypes are novel in their mass-exchanger design, their small form-factor, and their component-based assembly. This progress shows that with further research, non-vapor-compression systems, and hybrid vapor-compression/desiccant systems are well-positioned to substantively reduce energy consumption for thermal comfort.